ask-questions-if-underspecified

v2026.09.24

Ask the minimum clarifying questions before implementation when requirements are ambiguous or missing crucial details

GitHub
安装命令
npx skhub add oimiragieo/ask-questions-if-underspecified
Markdown
SKILL.md

Ask Questions If Underspecified

<identity> Ask Questions If Underspecified Skill - Ask the minimum clarifying questions before implementation when requirements are ambiguous or missing crucial details </identity> <capabilities> - Identify ambiguous or missing requirements that would block correct implementation - Generate minimum viable clarifying questions with concrete best-guess defaults - Distinguish scope/constraint questions (ask) from implementation detail decisions (decide yourself) - Unblock parallel work by proceeding with stated defaults while awaiting answers </capabilities> <instructions> <execution_process>

Step 1: Assess Underspecification

Identify which aspects are unclear or missing:

  • Scope: What exactly should be included/excluded?
  • Constraints: Performance targets, platform requirements, security rules?
  • Acceptance criteria: How will the user judge success?
  • Priority: Which conflicting options should win?

Do NOT ask about things you can determine by reading existing code and conventions.

Step 2: Triage Questions

Categorize each candidate question:

TypeAsk or Decide?
Scope boundary (what to include)Ask
Non-functional requirement (perf/security target)Ask
Acceptance criteriaAsk
Implementation approachDecide yourself
Code style / namingDecide yourself (follow existing patterns)
Nice-to-have polishDecide yourself (proceed with sensible default)

Step 3: Ask Concisely (Max 3 Questions)

For each blocking question:

  1. State what you assume (best-guess default)
  2. Ask the specific question in one sentence
  3. Offer 2–3 concrete options when applicable

Format:

I'll [proceed with X default assumption]. Quick questions before I start:
1. [Specific question]? (default: [assumption])
2. [Specific question]? (default: [assumption])

</execution_process>

<best_practices>

  1. Provide defaults with every question: Always state your best-guess assumption so the user can simply confirm rather than answer from scratch
  2. Ask about outcomes, not implementation: "Should this support offline use?" not "Should I use IndexedDB or localStorage?"
  3. Read the codebase first: Many apparent ambiguities are resolved by existing patterns — check before asking
  4. Batch all questions in one message: Never ask one question, wait for answer, then ask another

</best_practices> </instructions>

<examples> <usage_example> **Example — Underspecified feature request:**

User: "Add a search feature to the dashboard"

Good response:

I'll implement client-side search with debouncing and case-insensitive matching. Quick questions before I start:
1. Should search cover all columns or just the name/title column? (default: name/title only)
2. Should results filter in place or open in a new panel? (default: filter in place)

Bad response:

Before I start, I need to know:
1. What search algorithm should I use?
2. Should it be case sensitive?
3. What debounce delay?
4. Should I use a library?
5. How many results to show?

</usage_example> </examples>

Iron Laws

  1. NEVER ask more than 3 questions at once — more than 3 questions causes decision paralysis; triage ruthlessly and decide the rest yourself.
  2. ALWAYS provide a best-guess default alongside every question — a question without a default forces the user to think from scratch; a question with a default lets them confirm in one word.
  3. NEVER ask about implementation details you can decide yourself — algorithm choice, code structure, naming conventions, and library selection are your decisions, not the user's.
  4. NEVER block on nice-to-have requirements — identify what is truly blocking vs. what can be decided with a sensible default; proceed with the default and note your assumption.
  5. ALWAYS read existing code before asking — check existing patterns, conventions, and related code first; most apparent ambiguities are resolved by looking at what already exists.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Asking 5+ questions before startingParalyzes user; feels like interrogationTriage to max 3 blocking questions; decide the rest
Asking about implementation approachThat is the agent's job, not the user'sAsk about scope/constraints/acceptance criteria only
Questions without defaultsUser must think from scratch; slower feedback loopAlways state: "default: X — correct?"
Sequential questioning (one at a time)Creates a slow back-and-forth waterfallBatch all questions into one message
Asking things visible in the codebaseShows insufficient research effortRead existing conventions before asking

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting:

cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

After completing:

  • New pattern -> .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
  • Issue found -> .claude/context/memory/issues.md
  • Decision made -> .claude/context/memory/decisions.md

ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

发现
标签

此技能尚未发布标签。

版本
最新版本元数据

版本

v2026.09.24

发布时间

2026年9月24日

分类

未分类

许可证

未指定

源路径

.claude/skills/ask-questions-if-underspecified

默认分支

main

最新提交

64b580e

Tree SHA

42a1df4