CodeRabbit Common Errors
Overview
Diagnose the first failing boundary instead of relying on fixed wait-time tables. Installation, feature-branch configuration, eligibility, limits, and service health require separate evidence.
Prerequisites
- Identify the CodeRabbit organization, Git provider, repository, plan, and accountable owner.
- Read
references/official-docs.mdand re-check any time-sensitive contract before execution. - Use synthetic or read-only evidence until the approval boundary is satisfied.
- Preserve the repository's independent CI, security, and human-review requirements.
Current Contract
- The reviewed
.coderabbit.yamlcomes from the feature branch under review. - The default branch is always included;
base_branchesadds other targets. - Draft, author, title, and label controls can exclude a pull request.
- The YAML validator and
@coderabbitai configurationare contract checks.
Authentication
Treat Git-provider sessions, CodeRabbit web sessions, CLI credentials, and CodeRabbit API keys as separate credentials. Use only an already-approved session or secret-manager reference, never print a secret, and do not place credentials in .coderabbit.yaml, source files, logs, or deliverables.
Instructions
-
Capture provider, PR, author, draft state, target branch, labels, and last response.
-
Read and validate feature-branch YAML plus central or organization overrides.
-
Classify installation, eligibility, configuration, limit, command-state, or service failure.
-
Apply one reversible correction and compare the response with baseline.
Tool Discipline
- Use Glob to locate candidate configuration and evidence files without widening scope.
- Use Grep to find relevant fields, commands, identifiers, and stale claims.
- Use Read to inspect the smallest required files and authoritative evidence.
- Use Write only for a new approved local draft or evidence artifact.
- Use Edit only for a bounded approved change whose rollback is known.
- Do not use these file tools as a substitute for authenticated CodeRabbit or provider operations.
Approval Boundaries
Require owner approval before changing installation scope, organization settings, or pull-request state. Keep analysis and drafts local until approval is explicit, and record who approved the action and its scope.
Output
A redacted timeline, resolved-config evidence, fault classification, smallest fix, and verification result. Include source dates, unknowns, and the exact boundary between observed fact and recommendation.
Error Handling
| Condition | Response |
|---|---|
| Current contract is unclear or docs disagree | Stop mutation, cite both sources, and request owner resolution. |
| Required access or approval is missing | Produce a draft and evidence plan only. |
| Validation or pilot behavior differs from expectation | Restore the prior state and retain the failed evidence. |
| Output contains secrets or private code | Stop, quarantine the artifact, redact it, and notify the data owner. |
Examples
Example 1
Explain a skipped release PR whose target pattern is absent.
Example 2
Correct a runbook that says YAML must first be merged to the base branch.
Validation
- Confirm every claim against the dated sources in
references/official-docs.md. - Verify the requested scope, owner, approval, happy path, failure path, and rollback.
- Re-read the effective configuration or provider state after any approved change.
- Report unsupported fields, undocumented endpoints, and unverified assumptions as failures.
Resources
- Official documentation and contract notes
- Re-check the dated contract before any live operation.
- Treat unresolved or changed vendor behavior as a stop condition.