architecture-decision-records

v2026.09.24

Document technical decisions as Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) with context, options considered, and rationale.

GitHub
Install command
npx skhub add spencerpauly/architecture-decision-records
Markdown
SKILL.md

Architecture Decision Records

Document significant technical decisions so future you (and your team) understands why choices were made.

When to Write an ADR

Write one when you're making a decision that:

  • Is hard to reverse later
  • Affects multiple parts of the system
  • Involves tradeoffs between valid options
  • Will be questioned by someone in 6 months

Examples: choosing a database, adopting a framework, changing auth strategy, restructuring the API, adding a build tool.

Template

Create files in docs/decisions/ (or adr/) with sequential numbering:

# ADR-001: Use PostgreSQL for primary database

## Status

Accepted | Proposed | Deprecated | Superseded by ADR-XXX

## Date

2026-04-10

## Context

What is the problem or situation that requires a decision?
Include constraints, requirements, and forces at play.

## Options Considered

### Option A: PostgreSQL
- Pros: ACID compliance, JSON support, mature ecosystem, free
- Cons: Requires managing connections, vertical scaling limits

### Option B: MongoDB
- Pros: Flexible schema, horizontal scaling
- Cons: No transactions across collections, eventual consistency issues

### Option C: PlanetScale (MySQL)
- Pros: Serverless, branching, managed
- Cons: Vendor lock-in, no foreign keys in their branching model

## Decision

We chose **PostgreSQL** because:
1. Our data is relational — users, teams, projects with clear relationships
2. We need ACID transactions for billing operations
3. JSON columns give us schema flexibility where needed
4. Prisma/Drizzle have excellent Postgres support

## Consequences

- We need to manage connection pooling (use PgBouncer or Prisma's built-in pool)
- Migrations must be backwards-compatible for zero-downtime deploys
- We accept vertical scaling limits and will shard later if needed

Workflow

  1. Identify the decision being made
  2. Research the options (at least 2-3 alternatives)
  3. Write the ADR using the template
  4. Review with the team (PR or discussion)
  5. Merge as accepted
  6. Reference from code comments when relevant: // See ADR-001

File Naming

docs/decisions/
├── 001-use-postgresql.md
├── 002-adopt-trpc-over-rest.md
├── 003-switch-to-pnpm.md
└── template.md

Tips

  • Keep ADRs short — 1-2 pages max
  • Write them in the present tense ("We choose X" not "We chose X")
  • It's OK to write an ADR after the fact if you forgot to write one during the decision
  • Superseded ADRs should link to their replacement, not be deleted
  • ADRs are not design docs — they capture the decision, not the full design
Discovery
Tags

No tags published for this skill.

Version
Latest version metadata

Version

v2026.09.24

Published

Sep 24, 2026

Category

Uncategorized

License

CC0-1.0

Source path

resources/architecture-decision-records

Default branch

main

Latest commit

99cd265

Tree SHA

bceb4ed