gtm-pricing

v2026.09.24

B2B go-to-market strategy, pricing models, ICP development, positioning, and competitive intelligence. Use when planning GTM strategy, setting pricing, defining ICP, or evaluating opportunities.

GitHub
Install command
npx skhub add scientiacapital/gtm-pricing
Markdown
SKILL.md
<objective> Comprehensive B2B go-to-market framework covering ICP development (firmographics, technographics, psychographics), positioning (April Dunford canvas), pricing strategy (value-based, tiered, feature gating), and opportunity evaluation (scoring, red flags, complexity levels). </objective>

<quick_start> ICP scoring: 80+ = Ideal | 60-79 = Good | 40-59 = Marginal | <40 = Pass

Positioning statement:

For [target] who [need], [product] is a [category] that [benefit].
Unlike [alternative], our product [differentiator].

Value-based pricing: Price at 10-20% of quantified value delivered

Opportunity score: /100 across Market Fit, Technical Fit, GTM Fit, Personal Fit, Economics </quick_start>

<success_criteria> GTM strategy is successful when:

  • ICP documented with scoring criteria (firmographics, technographics, psychographics)
  • Positioning statement follows April Dunford framework
  • Pricing anchored to quantified value (not cost-plus)
  • Tier structure follows Good/Better/Best with clear feature gates
  • Opportunity scoring identifies red flags and good signals
  • Battle cards created for top 3 competitors
  • Launch checklist completed (pre-launch, launch, post-launch) </success_criteria>

<core_content> Comprehensive guide for B2B go-to-market strategy, pricing, and opportunity evaluation.

Quick Reference

FrameworkPurposeWhen to Use
ICP DevelopmentDefine ideal customerBefore any outreach
PositioningDifferentiate in marketProduct launch, pivot
Messaging HierarchyConsistent communicationSales enablement
Competitive IntelUnderstand landscapeDeal strategy, positioning
Value-Based PricingPrice by value deliveredSetting initial prices
Tier StructurePackage offeringFeature gating decisions
Opportunity ScoringEvaluate fitNew client/project decisions

Part 1: Go-To-Market Strategy

ICP Development Framework

Build your ICP across three dimensions, then score each prospect:

Dimension 1 -- Firmographics (who they are):

  • Company size: employee count range, revenue range
  • Industry: primary verticals, secondary, and explicitly excluded
  • Geography: target regions, excluded regions
  • Company type: startup, growth-stage, enterprise, SMB
  • Funding stage: bootstrapped, seed, Series A-D, public/PE-backed

Dimension 2 -- Technographics (what they use):

  • Required stack: must-have tech, nice-to-have, incompatible
  • Tech maturity: early adopter, early majority, late majority, laggard
  • Current solutions: CRM, ERP, industry-specific tools
  • Integration requirements: what your product must connect to
  • Pain indicators: manual processes, disconnected systems, spreadsheet workarounds

Dimension 3 -- Psychographics (how they buy):

  • Awareness stage: unaware, problem-aware, solution-aware, product-aware
  • Buying committee: economic buyer, technical buyer, user buyer, champion, blocker
  • Decision criteria: primary (speed, cost, features) and secondary
  • Risk tolerance: budget concerns, implementation risk, change management, vendor stability

ICP Scoring Rubric:

ScoreLabelAction
80-100IdealPrioritize -- full outreach cadence, executive sponsorship
60-79GoodPursue -- standard cadence, qualify thoroughly
40-59MarginalConditional -- only if specific signal changes (budget, timing)
<40PassDecline -- opportunity cost too high

Behavioral Signals to Watch:

  • High intent: searched for competitor alternatives, visited pricing page 3+ times, downloaded buyer's guide
  • Medium intent: attended webinar, engaged with case study, connected on LinkedIn
  • Low intent: blog subscriber, social follower, newsletter open

ICP Validation Checklist:

  1. TAM/SAM/SOM calculated with minimum 1,000 companies in ICP
  2. Historical win rate against ICP >30%
  3. ICP customers have lowest churn and highest NPS
  4. Sales team, CS, and product all agree on the profile

See reference/gtm.md for full YAML ICP worksheet templates and an example ICP (MEP contractors).


Positioning (April Dunford Framework)

The 5 Components of Positioning:

  1. Competitive alternatives -- What would customers use if you didn't exist? (Not just direct competitors -- include spreadsheets, manual processes, hiring, doing nothing)
  2. Unique attributes -- What do you have that alternatives don't? (Features, architecture, team expertise, data, integrations)
  3. Value -- What does the unique attribute enable for customers? (Time saved, revenue gained, risk reduced, cost avoided)
  4. Target customer -- Who cares most about that value? (The segment where your strengths matter most)
  5. Market category -- What market do you position in? (Existing category, subcategory, or create new category)

Positioning Statement Template:

For [target customer segment] who [key need/pain],
[product name] is a [market category]
that [primary value proposition].
Unlike [competitive alternative],
our product [key differentiator tied to unique attribute].

Messaging Hierarchy (3 levels, max 3 differentiators each):

LevelAudienceMessage Type
StrategicC-suite, boardBusiness outcomes, ROI, risk reduction
SolutionDirectors, VPsCapability, integration, workflow improvement
PersonaEnd users, adminsFeatures, UX, daily workflow benefits

Competitive Battle Card Essentials: For each top-3 competitor, document:

  • Overview: founded, HQ, funding, target market, pricing model
  • Strengths (acknowledge honestly -- credibility requires it)
  • Weaknesses mapped to your advantages
  • Common objections with value-based responses
  • Win strategy: lead differentiator, proof point, reference story
  • Questions to ask the prospect that expose competitor weaknesses

See reference/gtm.md for battle card template, positioning examples, and competitive positioning framework.


GTM Motion and Launch

GTM Motion Selection:

MotionACVSales CycleTeam NeededCAC
Product-Led Growth (PLG)<$5KDaysGrowth/productLow
Sales-Assisted$5-50KWeeksSDR + AEMedium
Enterprise$50K+MonthsAE + SE + CSMHigh
Partner/ChannelVariableVariablePartner ManagerVariable

Channel Mix: 60-70% primary motion, 20-30% secondary, 10% experimental.

Launch Checklist Milestones:

  • T-30 (Pre-launch): ICP validated, positioning finalized, messaging hierarchy complete, battle cards created, pricing approved, sales team trained, demo environment stable
  • T-0 (Launch): Website updated, outbound sequences activated, press release distributed, social campaign live, partner notifications sent
  • T+30 (Post-launch): Win/loss analysis started, messaging refined from feedback, pipeline reviewed, competitive response documented, metrics dashboard active

See reference/gtm.md for full launch checklists, channel strategy details, and complexity-to-resource matching.


Part 2: Pricing Strategy

Value-Based Pricing Method

Step 1 -- Quantify customer value:

Total Value = Time Savings + Revenue Impact + Cost Avoidance

Time Savings:   Hours saved/month x Hourly rate x 12
Revenue Impact: Additional revenue enabled per year
Cost Avoidance: Costs eliminated or reduced per year

Step 2 -- Set price at 10-20% of quantified value:

  • 10% = conservative (easy sell, high perceived value)
  • 15% = balanced (standard B2B SaaS)
  • 20% = aggressive (strong differentiation required)

Step 3 -- Validate against willingness-to-pay:

  • Van Westendorp price sensitivity: ask "too cheap / cheap / expensive / too expensive"
  • Competitive benchmarking: where do alternatives price?
  • Customer interviews: "Would you pay $X for Y outcome?"

Pricing Models

ModelBest ForProsCons
Flat rateSimple productsEasy to understandDoesn't scale with value
Per seatTeam toolsPredictable, scales with orgDiscourages adoption
Usage-basedAPIs, infraAligns cost with valueUnpredictable revenue
Tiered (Good/Better/Best)Feature differentiationAnchoring, clear upgrade pathComplex to design
Hybrid (seat + usage)Enterprise SaaSPredictable base + upsideComplex billing

Tier Design (Good/Better/Best)

Tier structure principles:

  • 3-4 tiers optimal (more creates decision paralysis)
  • Middle tier should be your target -- it gets the "Most Popular" badge
  • Top tier makes middle tier look reasonable (price anchoring)
  • Free tier only if PLG motion (land, qualify, viral growth)

Feature Gating Rules:

Gate ByExamplesWhen to Use
ScaleUsers, API calls, storage, projectsUsage naturally grows with value
SophisticationAdvanced analytics, AI features, workflowsFeatures require maturity to use
ControlSSO, SAML, audit logs, custom rolesEnterprise compliance needs
SupportSLA, dedicated CSM, phone supportWillingness to pay for service

Never gate: Security features, data export, basic integrations. Gating these breeds resentment and churn.

Discounting Strategy

TypeTriggerRangeUse When
VolumeCommitment to scale10-30%Large seat count, multi-year
TermAnnual commitment15-25%Monthly-to-annual conversion
CompetitiveSwitching from competitor20-40%Match remaining contract value
StrategicReference customer, logo valueUp to 50%Brand-name + case study commitment

Protect your pricing -- never discount when:

  • Customer hasn't articulated the value they'll receive
  • No competitive pressure exists
  • You're early in negotiation (discount later, not first)
  • Customer is purely price-shopping (they'll churn anyway)

Alternatives to discounting: Extended payment terms, additional training/onboarding, extended trial period, success-milestone feature unlocks, multi-year lock-in at current rate.

Key SaaS Pricing Metrics

MetricTargetFormula
LTV>3x CACARPU / monthly churn rate
CAC Payback<12 monthsCAC / ARPU
NRR>100%(Start MRR + expansion - contraction - churn) / Start MRR
Gross Margin>70%(Revenue - COGS) / Revenue

See reference/pricing.md for per-model deep dives, price increase playbook, services pricing, productized service model, and revenue model templates.


Part 3: Opportunity Evaluation

Quick Score (/100)

DimensionPointsWhat to Assess
Market Fit25Problem clarity (10), market size (8), timing (7)
Technical Fit20Can I build it (10), infrastructure fit (5), maintenance burden (5)
GTM Fit20Sales complexity (8), channel access (7), competition (5)
Personal Fit20Interest/energy (8), growth potential (7), lifestyle fit (5)
Economics15Revenue potential (8), time to revenue (4), risk/reward (3)

Score Interpretation and Action

ScoreActionNext Step
80-100STRONG PURSUEPrioritize immediately, allocate resources
60-79EXPLOREWorth a time-boxed deep dive (1-2 weeks)
40-59CONDITIONALPark it -- revisit only if a specific factor changes
0-39PASSDecline -- opportunity cost too high

Red Flags (Automatic Deductions)

Any of these should subtract 10-20 points from your score:

  • Unclear payment terms: "We'll figure out compensation later"
  • Expanding scope pre-start: Requirements growing before contract signed
  • Pressure to decide fast: "We need an answer by Friday" on a major commitment
  • Misaligned incentives: Their success doesn't require your success
  • Economics don't work even optimistically: If best-case math doesn't pencil, walk away
  • Single-threaded champion: Only one person wants this; no organizational buy-in
  • No budget allocated: Interested but no approved spend

GTM Complexity Levels

LevelBuyerACVCycleDecision Style
PLGIndividual user<$2KDaysUser = buyer, self-serve
Low-TouchManager$2-15K1-4 weeksLight demo, quick approval
Mid-MarketDirector/VP$15-100K1-3 monthsCommittee, multiple stakeholders
EnterpriseC-suite$100K-1M6-18 monthsRFP, security review, legal
ComplexBoard-level$1M+12-36 monthsTransformation project

Match complexity to your resources:

  • Solo / side project: target Level 1-2 max
  • Small team: target Level 2-3
  • Funded startup: target Level 2-4
  • Enterprise sales org: target Level 3-5

5-Minute Viability Test

Before deep-diving any opportunity, answer four questions:

  1. How much will one customer pay? $____/month
  2. How many customers can I realistically get in 6 months? ____
  3. What does it cost to serve one customer? $____/month
  4. How many hours/week will this take? ____

Quick math:

  • Monthly revenue at 6 months: #2 x #1
  • Monthly costs: #2 x #3
  • Monthly margin: Revenue - Costs
  • Effective hourly rate: Margin / (hours x 4.33)
  • If hourly rate < $100 --> needs rethinking

Build vs Partner vs Buy Decision

SignalBuildPartnerBuy
Core differentiatorYes
Commodity capabilityYes
Complementary strengthYes
Time-criticalYes
Learning value highYes
Maintenance burden highYesYes
No good alternative existsYes

See reference/opportunity.md for detailed scoring rubrics per dimension, full scorecard YAML templates, unit economics worksheets, cost structure analysis, break-even calculations, and build-vs-partner decision trees.


Reference Files

  • reference/gtm.md - ICP YAML templates, behavioral signals, validation checklist, channel strategy, launch playbooks, battle card template, positioning examples
  • reference/pricing.md - Model deep dives, tier design, price increase playbook, services pricing, discount framework, SaaS metrics dashboard
  • reference/opportunity.md - Full scoring rubrics (5 sections), scorecard YAML, unit economics, cost analysis, break-even formulas, build/partner/buy decision trees </core_content>

Emit Outcome Sidecar

As the final step, write to ~/.claude/skill-analytics/last-outcome-gtm-pricing.json:

{"ts":"[UTC ISO8601]","skill":"gtm-pricing","version":"1.0.0","variant":"default",
 "status":"[success|partial|error]","runtime_ms":[estimated ms from start],
 "metrics":{"pricing_models_evaluated":[n],"tiers_designed":[n],"gtm_channels_mapped":[n]},
 "error":null,"session_id":"[YYYY-MM-DD]"}

Use status "partial" if some stages failed but results were produced. Use "error" only if no output was generated.

Discovery
Tags

No tags published for this skill.

Version
Latest version metadata

Version

v2026.09.24

Published

Sep 24, 2026

Category

Uncategorized

License

Not specified

Source path

active/gtm-pricing-skill

Default branch

main

Latest commit

9e03af3

Tree SHA

5b28287