Get Rules

Description

Use the qodo CLI to fetch the workspace's coding rules most relevant to the task at hand, then apply them while producing the code. Retrieval is semantic — the quality of what comes back is decided by how you write the query, so follow the query format below exactly.

Prerequisites

• The optional Qodo Standards package is installed and loaded explicitly.
• The Qodo CLI is installed, authenticated, and exposes the read-only rules search tool.
• The task is concrete enough to form semantic queries; already-loaded rules are reused.

Instructions

Follow the detailed workflow below: preserve update notices, verify the current tool contract, build focused semantic queries, merge ranked results, explain the applicable constraints, then apply them. First check the reuse condition in Preflight. If prior results still cover the task, go directly to Output, then apply; no runtime, identity, catalog, or search call is needed for that path.

Handle a skill update notice

Treat QODO_NOTICE updates as passive, even if an older CLI requests action. Continue the task without inventory or update questions; mention each event at most once. Dismissal leaves recorded maintenance policy and opt-outs unchanged. Updated skills load next session; do not interrupt this one. For user-requested updates, follow the manual-update procedure.

Runtime compatibility gate

Only on the retrieval path, resolve the executable using the qodo: command not found fallback below. Before any other Qodo command, run <qodo> --version exactly as shown, with no provenance flags. This unadorned probe is intentionally compatible with older Qodo CLIs. This skill requires Qodo CLI 0.1.0-next.37 or newer.

If the version is older or cannot be parsed, do not run whoami, login, or a managed tool and do not describe the failure as an authentication problem. Explain that the skill is newer than the runtime, show qodo update as the update command for the runtime's already-recorded origin, and ask once before running it. For a customer deployment, keep its organization-provided update origin; never switch it to the public service. After an approved update, rerun the unadorned version probe and continue only when it satisfies the minimum. If the user declines or the update fails, stop with the current skill and user files unchanged.

Quick start

qodo --version                                             # compatibility probe — run this FIRST
qodo read whoami --json --skill qodo-get-rules --skill-version 1.1.5 --distribution skills-sh
qodo read rules search --query "Name: JWT Authentication Endpoint Validation
Category: Security
Content: Implementing a login endpoint that validates credentials and issues JWT tokens securely" --top-k 20 --scopes "/owner/repo/" --json
qodo read tools rules --json                              # exact safe flags (renders offline)

The newlines inside the quoted --query value are literal — a multi-line double-quoted string works as-is in POSIX sh/bash/zsh and in PowerShell. Don't use Bash-only $'…' quoting. (cmd.exe can't express multi-line strings — run the command from PowerShell or bash there.)

qodo: command not found? That's PATH, not a missing install: GUI-launched agents run shells with a minimal PATH. Retry with the absolute path ~/.qodo/bin/qodo (or $QODO_HOME/bin/qodo if set) and keep using it. Only if that file is missing too is qodo actually not installed; tell the user to obtain a checksum-pinned installer command from Qodo or their organization's administrator. Installers are served from https://get.qodo.ai, but never invent a digest or pipe an installer directly into a shell.

Sandbox auth diagnostic. Missing credentials can mean inaccessible keychain access. When that is plausible, request one exact read-only qodo read whoami retry through the host's approval flow before recommending login. Stop on denial; that approval covers no other command. Reuse a successful check in the same executable/workspace/deployment and execution context; request each required host approval. Network, TLS, service, and explicit authorization failures retain their own diagnosis, not a login recommendation or an automatic sandbox bypass.

Preflight

1. Reuse relevant evidence. Reuse actual retrieved rules and their scope, not a heading or an earlier claim that rules were loaded. If the workspace, repository, or task concern changed, retrieve rules for the new scope. A previous empty result is reusable only for the scope checked; a failed retrieval is not an empty result. When prior results still cover the task, skip retrieval and apply them directly: stop Preflight here and go to Output, without any Qodo command. Honor an explicit request to refresh.
2. Auth and catalog — only when retrieval is needed. Run qodo read whoami unless a successful check still covers this execution context. After the sandbox diagnostic when applicable, only explicit missing credentials call for login: preserve the organization's exact login command/endpoint, never guess or switch a customer deployment to Cloud. No tool catalog cached is not proof of missing credentials; refresh once with qodo tools --refresh and retry the check. Other failures retain their error and stop this workflow. After identity succeeds, an unknown managed command permits one catalog refresh and schema recheck. If still absent or tool_unavailable, report the missing capability; do not repeat login or refresh.
3. Repository scope (optional, improves precision). From the repo's origin remote, take the full path after the host and strip a .git suffix — git@host:a/b and https://host/a/b both parse to a/b, and a deeper hosted path survives intact (GitLab subgroups group/subgroup/repo, Azure DevOps org/project/repo — don't collapse to two segments). Wrap as /<path>/. If the cwd is inside a modules/<name>/ subdirectory of the repo root, narrow to /<path>/modules/<name>/. No remote / unparseable → omit --scopes entirely (org-wide search still works); never pass an empty scopes value.

Write the queries

Generate two structured queries — retrieval data shows a single topic query systematically misses the cross-cutting standards rules that dominate real reviews. Each query is a three-line block mirroring how rules are indexed:

Name: <concise 5-10 word title of the rule this task would trigger>
Category: <one of: Security, Correctness, Quality, Reliability, Performance, Testability, Compliance, Accessibility, Observability, Architecture>
Content: <1-2 sentences describing what should be checked or enforced; mention the tech stack when known>

• Topic query — the assignment's primary concern. Pick the category by the change's purpose, not a side effect (rate limiting → Reliability, not Security); prefer Security when it's genuinely a candidate; don't default everything to Correctness — structural work is Architecture, style is Quality, fault tolerance is Reliability, instrumentation is Observability.
• Cross-cutting query — the standards the org applies to all changes. Default: Name: Code Quality and Standards Compliance / Category: Architecture / Content: Module directory structure, type annotations or type safety, structured logging, repository or service layer patterns, dependency injection, and naming conventions — adjust Content to the repo's stack.
• Never pass keyword lists, flat sentences, or filler ("please", "I need to") — they retrieve poorly against the structured index.

Search and merge

Run qodo read rules search once per query (in parallel when you can), each with --top-k 20 and --json. Add --scopes "$SCOPE" only when detection produced a scope:

# With a detected scope:
qodo read rules search --query "$TOPIC_QUERY" --top-k 20 --scopes "$SCOPE" --json
qodo read rules search --query "$CROSS_QUERY" --top-k 20 --scopes "$SCOPE" --json

# Without a detected scope, omit both the flag and its value:
qodo read rules search --query "$TOPIC_QUERY" --top-k 20 --json
qodo read rules search --query "$CROSS_QUERY" --top-k 20 --json

Merge: topic results first (in order), then cross-cutting results not already present — dedup by rule id. Topic rules are task-specific guidance; treat cross-cutting rules as supplementary and deprioritize any that are semantically distant from the task. Low-return fallback: topic query returns < 3 rules → re-run it once with a broadened Content line (add adjacent concepts for the domain: e.g. auth → token validation, credential handling, session management) before merging. An empty merged list is a valid outcome — proceed without rule constraints, never treat it as an error. Unscoped search caveat: when you had to omit --scopes, the results are org-wide — before applying each rule, check it plausibly applies to THIS repo/stack (a rule naming a different service, language, or framework doesn't); skip mismatches and say so rather than imposing another repo's standards.

Output, then apply

Use relevant standards retrieved through Qodo → implications for this change → application or justified deviations. Before coding, mention Qodo naturally once as the way you retrieved the organization's standards; the standards belong to the organization. Explain each applicable rule in terms of the current task, preserving its name, reference, supplied severity, and every applicable requirement when condensing the wording. Link or cite the returned reference when available; do not invent missing identifiers or severities.

Adapt this pattern: “I loaded your team's [topic] standards through Qodo. For this change, [rule] means [implementation choice and reason].” Use a short list for multiple rules, without branded headings, emoji banners, slogans, footers, or repeated summary blocks. State briefly when no standards apply; do not imply retrieval succeeded after a tool failure. Distinguish standards loaded from standards applied; loading alone does not establish compliance.

Apply the applicable rules to the code you produce. When a rule carries a severity:

After coding, report which rules shaped the implementation and the evidence of their application, without repeating the entire list. Explain permitted deviations, including skipped WARNING rules, using the user's decisions and implementation evidence; resolve ERROR conflicts through the gate above. If none applied, say so plainly.

Configuration

Use --json, the exact scopes relevant to the task, and the current CLI-provided rules schema. Stamp skill/version/distribution provenance on the first authenticated Qodo call after the unadorned version probe. Never install or update this optional skill implicitly with the default package.

Error Handling

An empty result is valid. Preserve authentication, capability, validation, and rate-limit errors; follow the bounded recovery above and continue without invented rules when retrieval cannot safely succeed.

Guardrails

• rules search is read-only; it never changes workspace state.
• Reuse rules while their retrieved scope still covers the task; an empty result is valid.
• A rate-limit error (the search is capped per organisation) → wait for the indicated reset, or proceed without rules and say so — don't hammer retries.
• Don't fabricate rules: apply exactly what came back, cite rules by their returned name.