testing-boss

v2026.09.24

Author or review software tests and LLM/agent evals; choose test placement and mocks, diagnose flaky CI, or repair brittle suites. Excludes unrelated code review, debugging, CI design, and production observability.

GitHub
Install command
npx skhub add pedronauck/testing-boss
Markdown
SKILL.md

Testing Boss

Choose tests that can expose the changed behavior's failure. Use the existing suite at the lowest layer that can observe the invariant; reuse fixtures and utilities before creating new files.

  • Assert observable results, not mock behavior or implementation structure. Keep mocks at unit-test I/O boundaries; use real integration evidence for integration claims.
  • When a test exposes a regression, fix production code. Change an incorrect test only with evidence that its contract is wrong or intentionally changed; preserve valid coverage.
  • Existing tests or stronger build/codegen/link/render checks may already own the invariant. Do not add prose, CSS, generated-output, configuration, or snapshot tests without a real artifact contract and a reason the owning gate is insufficient.
  • Coverage and mutation scores help find blind spots; they do not replace a behavioral oracle. Do not add production branches or methods solely for tests.
  • Run affected checks, then the project's delivery gates. Reuse results for unchanged inputs and expand only for a failure, relevant edit, or unresolved risk. Match regression reproduction to the failure; avoid a second ceremony when red/green evidence already exists.

References by Question

Read the relevant section, including its contract dependencies, when the question arises; test authorship by an agent does not itself require every reference.

QuestionReference
Which layer or suite owns the invariant?references/foundations.md
How should selectors, waits, data, or mocks work?references/patterns.md
Why is a test brittle or passing for the wrong reason?references/antipatterns.md
How should agent-generated tests be evaluated?references/ai-writes-tests.md
How should flakiness or contract/property/mutation checks be handled?references/ci-automation.md
How should an LLM/agent outcome be evaluated?references/llm-eval.md

references/sources.md holds supporting sources. Completion evidence can be a concise command/result summary; no separate report is needed unless the task's artifact contract requires one.

Discovery
Tags

No tags published for this skill.

Version
Latest version metadata

Version

v2026.09.24

Published

Sep 24, 2026

Category

Uncategorized

License

Not specified

Source path

skills/mine/testing-boss

Default branch

main

Latest commit

0422940

Tree SHA

d2996c2