CodeRabbit Security Controls
Overview
Use documented CodeRabbit Security and tools while retaining independent scanners and human review. AI findings cannot prove absence of vulnerabilities.
Prerequisites
- Identify the CodeRabbit organization, Git provider, repository, plan, and accountable owner.
- Read
references/official-docs.mdand re-check any time-sensitive contract before execution. - Use synthetic or read-only evidence until the approval boundary is satisfied.
- Preserve the repository's independent CI, security, and human-review requirements.
Current Contract
- CodeRabbit documents repo security scanning and security Change Stack views.
- The tool catalog includes static, secret, dependency, and infrastructure analyzers.
- CodeRabbit can ingest GitHub Checks.
- SkillSpector scans agent skills and MCP configuration.
Authentication
Treat Git-provider sessions, CodeRabbit web sessions, CLI credentials, and CodeRabbit API keys as separate credentials. Use only an already-approved session or secret-manager reference, never print a secret, and do not place credentials in .coderabbit.yaml, source files, logs, or deliverables.
Instructions
-
Classify threat model, sensitive paths, languages, builds, checks, and requirements.
-
Map risks to supported tools, guidance, external gates, or manual controls.
-
Configure supported layers and retain provider security checks.
-
Test safe seeded fixtures, record gaps, and define escalation.
Tool Discipline
- Use Glob to locate candidate configuration and evidence files without widening scope.
- Use Grep to find relevant fields, commands, identifiers, and stale claims.
- Use Read to inspect the smallest required files and authoritative evidence.
- Use Write only for a new approved local draft or evidence artifact.
- Use Edit only for a bounded approved change whose rollback is known.
- Do not use these file tools as a substitute for authenticated CodeRabbit or provider operations.
Approval Boundaries
Require security approval before disabling tools, excluding sensitive paths, or accepting high-risk findings. Keep analysis and drafts local until approval is explicit, and record who approved the action and its scope.
Output
A threat-control matrix, patch, independent-gate inventory, fixture evidence, gaps, and escalation. Include source dates, unknowns, and the exact boundary between observed fact and recommendation.
Error Handling
| Condition | Response |
|---|---|
| Current contract is unclear or docs disagree | Stop mutation, cite both sources, and request owner resolution. |
| Required access or approval is missing | Produce a draft and evidence plan only. |
| Validation or pilot behavior differs from expectation | Restore the prior state and retain the failed evidence. |
| Output contains secrets or private code | Stop, quarantine the artifact, redact it, and notify the data owner. |
Examples
Example 1
Enable secret and IaC tools while keeping provider scanning.
Example 2
Test SkillSpector with a synthetic unsafe MCP fixture.
Validation
- Confirm every claim against the dated sources in
references/official-docs.md. - Verify the requested scope, owner, approval, happy path, failure path, and rollback.
- Re-read the effective configuration or provider state after any approved change.
- Report unsupported fields, undocumented endpoints, and unverified assumptions as failures.
Resources
- Official documentation and contract notes
- Re-check the dated contract before any live operation.
- Treat unresolved or changed vendor behavior as a stop condition.