CodeRabbit Cost and Usage Review
Overview
Build an approval-ready cost decision from current dashboard and plan evidence. Prices, allowances, and entitlements are time-sensitive.
Prerequisites
- Identify the CodeRabbit organization, Git provider, repository, plan, and accountable owner.
- Read
references/official-docs.mdand re-check any time-sensitive contract before execution. - Use synthetic or read-only evidence until the approval boundary is satisfied.
- Preserve the repository's independent CI, security, and human-review requirements.
Current Contract
- The plans page is authoritative for current prices and hourly allowances.
- Seats and administrative roles are separate controls.
- The usage-based add-on can extend eligible PR and CLI reviews.
- Mid-cycle changes can create prorated charges.
Authentication
Treat Git-provider sessions, CodeRabbit web sessions, CLI credentials, and CodeRabbit API keys as separate credentials. Use only an already-approved session or secret-manager reference, never print a secret, and do not place credentials in .coderabbit.yaml, source files, logs, or deliverables.
Instructions
-
Capture plan, cadence, seats, add-on state, and usage for one period.
-
Separate unused seats, avoidable overage, repository scope, and capacity needs.
-
Model keep, right-size, and upgrade scenarios with dated prices.
-
Present savings, impact, owner, effective date, and rollback constraints.
Tool Discipline
- Use Glob to locate candidate configuration and evidence files without widening scope.
- Use Grep to find relevant fields, commands, identifiers, and stale claims.
- Use Read to inspect the smallest required files and authoritative evidence.
- Use Write only for a new approved local draft or evidence artifact.
- Use Edit only for a bounded approved change whose rollback is known.
- Do not use these file tools as a substitute for authenticated CodeRabbit or provider operations.
Approval Boundaries
Never buy credits, change plans, remove seats, or alter access without billing and organization-owner approval. Keep analysis and drafts local until approval is explicit, and record who approved the action and its scope.
Output
A dated baseline, scenario table, evidence links, recommendation, and approval record. Include source dates, unknowns, and the exact boundary between observed fact and recommendation.
Error Handling
| Condition | Response |
|---|---|
| Current contract is unclear or docs disagree | Stop mutation, cite both sources, and request owner resolution. |
| Required access or approval is missing | Produce a draft and evidence plan only. |
| Validation or pilot behavior differs from expectation | Restore the prior state and retain the failed evidence. |
| Output contains secrets or private code | Stop, quarantine the artifact, redact it, and notify the data owner. |
Examples
Example 1
Identify inactive assigned seats before a downgrade.
Example 2
Compare a higher plan with usage credits using current evidence.
Validation
- Confirm every claim against the dated sources in
references/official-docs.md. - Verify the requested scope, owner, approval, happy path, failure path, and rollback.
- Re-read the effective configuration or provider state after any approved change.
- Report unsupported fields, undocumented endpoints, and unverified assumptions as failures.
Resources
- Official documentation and contract notes
- Re-check the dated contract before any live operation.
- Treat unresolved or changed vendor behavior as a stop condition.