CodeRabbit CI Integration
Overview
Build a merge policy from observable provider state. CodeRabbit review state, GitHub Checks ingestion, and branch protection are separate contracts.
Prerequisites
- Identify the CodeRabbit organization, Git provider, repository, plan, and accountable owner.
- Read
references/official-docs.mdand re-check any time-sensitive contract before execution. - Use synthetic or read-only evidence until the approval boundary is satisfied.
- Preserve the repository's independent CI, security, and human-review requirements.
Current Contract
reviews.request_changes_workflowcontrols whether CodeRabbit can submit a changes-requested review.- The GitHub Checks tool reads existing CI results; it does not prove CodeRabbit publishes a stable check name.
- Branch rules must use check names observed in the target repository.
- Emergency paths must retain independent tests, security checks, and audit evidence.
Authentication
Treat Git-provider sessions, CodeRabbit web sessions, CLI credentials, and CodeRabbit API keys as separate credentials. Use only an already-approved session or secret-manager reference, never print a secret, and do not place credentials in .coderabbit.yaml, source files, logs, or deliverables.
Instructions
-
Inspect current branch rules, recent CodeRabbit reviews, and actual check-run names.
-
Choose whether review state is advisory or required, and list independent CI authorities.
-
Pilot the smallest YAML and branch-rule change without enabling enforcement.
-
Prove clean, failing, and rollback paths before enabling the policy.
Tool Discipline
- Use Glob to locate candidate configuration and evidence files without widening scope.
- Use Grep to find relevant fields, commands, identifiers, and stale claims.
- Use Read to inspect the smallest required files and authoritative evidence.
- Use Write only for a new approved local draft or evidence artifact.
- Use Edit only for a bounded approved change whose rollback is known.
- Do not use these file tools as a substitute for authenticated CodeRabbit or provider operations.
Approval Boundaries
Require repository-owner approval before changing branch rules, request-changes behavior, or bypass procedures. Keep analysis and drafts local until approval is explicit, and record who approved the action and its scope.
Output
A merge-policy record, observed check inventory, reviewed patch, pilot evidence, and rollback procedure. Include source dates, unknowns, and the exact boundary between observed fact and recommendation.
Error Handling
| Condition | Response |
|---|---|
| Current contract is unclear or docs disagree | Stop mutation, cite both sources, and request owner resolution. |
| Required access or approval is missing | Produce a draft and evidence plan only. |
| Validation or pilot behavior differs from expectation | Restore the prior state and retain the failed evidence. |
| Output contains secrets or private code | Stop, quarantine the artifact, redact it, and notify the data owner. |
Examples
Example 1
Replace a guessed coderabbitai required check with observed review and check evidence.
Example 2
Pilot request-changes behavior while retaining required tests and secret scanning.
Validation
- Confirm every claim against the dated sources in
references/official-docs.md. - Verify the requested scope, owner, approval, happy path, failure path, and rollback.
- Re-read the effective configuration or provider state after any approved change.
- Report unsupported fields, undocumented endpoints, and unverified assumptions as failures.
Resources
- Official documentation and contract notes
- Re-check the dated contract before any live operation.
- Treat unresolved or changed vendor behavior as a stop condition.